← Back to articles

Apple Wins Court Victory Over AliveCor Patent Lawsuit

January 9, 2026

Apple secured a significant legal victory today as the federal appeals court confirmed the invalidation of three patents that AliveCor claimed Apple infringed with the Apple Watch. This decision also led to the vacating of an ITC ruling that could have resulted in an import ban on the Apple Watch.

Background of the Case

AliveCor filed a lawsuit against Apple in 2021, alleging patent infringement related to heart rate monitoring and ECG technology used in the Apple Watch. Initially, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) found that Apple had violated three of AliveCor's patents. Apple challenged this finding by requesting a review from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), which ultimately invalidated the patents by rejecting several claims, significantly weakening AliveCor's case.

ITC's Initial Ruling and Apple's Appeal

Despite the patent invalidation, the International Trade Commission (ITC) recommended a limited exclusion order and a cease-and-desist against the Apple Watch. Apple appealed this decision, arguing that the involved patents were no longer valid. The ITC order was suspended pending the appeals process.

Federal Court’s Decision

The federal appeals court upheld the PTAB’s decision to invalidate the patents and vacated the ITC's ruling, meaning there will be no import ban on Apple Watch products related to this case. AliveCor expressed disappointment with the court’s decision.

Reactions from AliveCor

In a statement to MacRumors, AliveCor expressed their discontent:

“We are deeply disappointed by the Court’s decisions and that the Court did not review the secondary considerations, which the ITC found persuasive of the patents' validity. This ruling does not impact our ability to continue innovating for our customers. These cases go beyond AliveCor; they are vital for small companies and future innovations at risk from dominant players. We will explore all legal options, including potential appeals, to defend our patents and promote fair competition.”

Impact on Future Litigation

AliveCor’s antitrust lawsuit against Apple, filed last year, was dismissed, though it is currently under appeal. However, Apple has faced ongoing legal challenges elsewhere, notably a separate dispute with blood oxygen technology firm Masimo, which still results in an import ban on certain Apple Watch models in the U.S. and the disabling of blood oxygen sensing features in the U.S. market models.

Developer and Industry Implications

Apple’s victory reinforces its ongoing commitment to develop innovative health features for the Apple Watch. The company emphasized its dedication to health, wellness, and safety technologies, stating:

“Apple's teams have worked tirelessly over many years to develop industry-leading health, wellness, and safety features that meaningfully impact users' lives, and we intend to stay on this path."

Related Stories